Netbooks, I don’t get ‘em. I see them as incomplete & only a bridging technology. Don’t read me wrong, I like the idea of Netbooks & it’s that which brings me to thinking of them as bridging technology; they’re just smaller, cheaper laptops.
Wikipedia:
A netbook (a portmanteau of Internet and notebook) is a class of laptop computer designed for wireless communication and access to the Internet.”
Smaller, cheaper laptops — that doesn’t warrant a “designed for wireless communication and access to the Internet” stamp. For starters, where’s my built in 3G (or any OTA technologies).
Bridging technology? So maybe technology is the wrong word — it’s breaking the consumers cycle of more Mhz, Ghz, bigger numbers, more powerful machines… for my spreadsheet. It’s choosing functionality over stats. So far the functionality isn’t a “design for wireless communication and access to the Internet”, it’s portability. It’s a step in the right direction & priming us for what will come.

Web applications & SaaS rise of recent years has removed many responsibilities from the end-user, responsibilities they never wanted (security, technology, etc) and leaves them with ownership of the responsibilities they always wanted (i.e. data ownership). The technologies; modern browsers, Google Gears, constant connectivity (a work in progress, of varying speeds & more common in some parts of the world than others) has contributed a lot as well.
The Netbook I see takes this further. The Netbook I want takes this further.
Google Gears does a great job of online/offline sync within web applications. Apple iTunes does a great job of application sync between phone, notebook, & OTA into the cloud (I’ll use “sync” as real sync / automated download and (optionally) install / caching, as one term. To the end-user it’s much of a muchness). Imagine, an operating system with sync at its core, sync the operating system, the applications, the content. The OS provider is responsible for the operating system, the software developer for the applications, and the end-user for the data whom is in control of both the OS & the applications.
Both native & web applications would probably blend a little from the end-users perspective in this OS — I mean it is “designed for wireless communication and access to the Internet” — like on the iPhone, I access both native & web applications via icons on the dashboard. Let’s do the same with Dock (or Start Menu for you Windows users). Fluid, Prism, AIR, etc. are already helping this transition.
Enter Apple.
Rumors of Apple doing a Netbook are circling, and while I know nothing (no doubt I’d be NDA’d if I did…) consider:
- Operating system, check. They could roll this out.
- Application sync, check. It’s in iTunes.
- Web application sync, not yet… but with Webkit being licensed they’ve a sizable market share to role that out to. (spot why Chrome isn’t 100% Webkit!)
- Customers, check. That “get it”, check. Because they’ve been using web & native applications side by side on all devices, check. That’d upgrade, check.
- Small, light notebooks designed for OTA, check.
Looks good, but Apple has high user experience rules… that costs. Netbooks are cheap (in cost). If only there was a way to subsidize the cost of fabrication, say with an App Store. Oh wait…
You can figure the rest out.